Architecture is not the alternative to anatomy, architecture is complementary to anatomy. Take a bridge. A bridge is built of elements, and the way the elements are constructed determines the architecture. The architecture is the mechanical relationship between the elements. The bridge can be disassembled back into its component elements and then reconstructed at a new location using a new configuration of the same parts to create a different architecture that serves a new purpose. So architecture is the complementary dimension of muscle and ligament anatomy. The body is not a construction of parts and elements. Anatomy is not the organizational principle of the body. The organizational principle of our bodies and of every living thing is entirety, is wholeness, and the wholeness is sub-organized in parts, in elements. So the whole is not built up from the anatomical parts but the anatomy is a kind of organization of the wholeness and the organization can follow architectural, mechanical principles, it can follow bio-mechanical gradients. So that is a different way to look at the structure or to look at the anatomy of it. We have to think in terms of architectural units rather than discrete anatomy. The body is a process in time. The body is a performance ! |